December 29, 2006

If This Is One of The Sexiest Things You've Ever Seen, You May Be a Narcissist

white heels

 

A quick primer on the new Narcissism.

I don't mean the traditional Kernberg, Kohut, or even Freudian descriptions.  In the modern times, I think narcissism has evolved.

A narcissist isn't necessarily an egotist, someone who thinks they are the best.  A quick screen is an inability to appreciate that other people exist, and have thoughts, feelings, and actions unrelated to the narcissist.  These thoughts don't have to be good ones, but they have to be linked to the narcissist. ("I'm going to get some gas-- because that jerk never fills the car.")

The narcissist believes he is the main character in his own movie.  Everyone else has a supporting role-- everyone around him becomes a "type."  You know how in every romantic comedy, there's always the funny friend who helpes the main character figure out her relationship?  In the movie, her whole existence is to be there fore the main character.  But in real life, that funny friend has her own life; she might even be the main character in her own movie, right?  Well the narcissist wouldn't be able to grasp that.  Her friends are always supporting characters, that can be called at any hour of the night, that will always be interested in what she is wearing, or what she did.  That funny friend isn't just being kind, she doesn't just want to help-- she's personally interested in the narcissist's life.  Of course she is.

A comedian I can't remember made a joke about actors in LA, but it's applicable to narcissists: when two narcissists go out, they just wait for the other person's mouth to stop moving so they can talk about themselves.

So on the one hand, the narcissist reduces everyone else to a type, as it relates to himself; on the other hand, the narcissist, as the main character in his movie, has an identity that he wants (i.e. he made it up) and requires all others to supplement that identity.

A narcissist looks the same every day; he has a "look" with a defining characteristic: a certain haircut; a mustache; a type of clothing, a tatoo.  He used these to create an identity in his mind that he will spend a lot of energy keeping up.

Consider the narcissist who wants his wife to wear only white, high heeled pumps.  The narcissist wants this not because he himself likes white high heel pumps-- which he might-- but because the type of person he thinks he is would only be with the type of woman who wears white high heeled pumps.  Or, in other terms, other people would expect someone like himself to be with a woman who wears those shoes.  What he likes isn't the relevant factor, and certainly what she likes is irrelevant.  What matters is that she (and her shoes) are accessories to him.

Never mind that the woman is obese, or 65, or the shoes out of style, or impractical-- the shoes represent something to him, and he is trying to reinforce his identity through that object.

Narcissists typically focus on specific things as proxies for their identity.  As in the example above, that the woman might be obese or a paraplegic could be ignored if the footwear was the proxy for identity.  These proxies are also easy to describe but loaded with implication: "I'm married to a blonde."  Saying "blonde" implies something-- e.g.  she's hot-- that might not be true.  But the narcissist has so fetishized "blondeness" that it is disconnected from reality.  The connotations, not the reality, are what matters (especially if other people can't check.)

This explains why narcissists feel personally sleighted when the fetishized object disappears.  "My wife stopped dying her hair blonde; but when she used to date her other boyfriends, she was in the salon every month.  Bitch."  He doesn't see the obvious passage of time, what he sees is part of his identity being taken from him, on purpose.  Here's the final insult: "she obviously doesn't care about me as much as her old boyfriends."

As a paradigm, the narcissist is the first born (or only) child, aged 2-3.  Everything is about him, and everything is binary.  His, or not his.  Satisfied, or not satisfied.  Hungry, or not hungry.  Mom and Dad are talking to each other and not me?  "Hello!  Focus on me!"  Youngest children don't typicaly become narcissists because from the moment of their birth, they know there are other characters in the movie.  (Youngest more easily becomes borderline.) Control, of course, is important to a narcissist. If you can imagine a 40 year old man with the ego of a 2 year old, you've got a narcissist.

Obviously, not all first borns go on to be narcissists.  Part of their development comes from not learning that there is a right and wrong that exists outside them.  This may come from inconsistent parenting:

 

Dad says, "you stupid kid, don't watch TV, TV is bad, it'll make you stupid!"  Ok.  Lesson learned.  But then one day Dad has to do some work: "stop making so much noise!  Here, sit down and watch TV."  What's the learned message?  It isn't that TV is sometimes good and sometimes bad.  It's that good and bad are decided by the person with the most power. 

 

So the goal in development is to become the one with the most power.  Hence, narcissists can be dogmatic ("adultery is immoral!") and hypocrites ("well, she came on to me, and you were ignoring me at home")  at the same time.  There is no right and wrong-- only right and wrong for them.  He's an exaggerated example: if they have to kill someone to get what they want, then so be it.  But when they murder, they don't actually think what they're doing is wrong--they're saying, "I know it's illegal, but if you understood the whole situation, you'd understand..."

Narcissists never feel guilt.  Only shame.


vote down
vote up
Score: 3 (3 votes cast)


Recommend to a Friend

Email this news to*:

Message (optional):

*. The news could be sent to one person at a time


Comments

December 30, 2006 7:24 PM | Posted by Anonymous: | Reply

The husband obviously has a problem if he thinks white pumps are cool.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)

December 31, 2006 7:15 PM | Posted by Anonymous: | Reply

Do you see blogging itself as a manifestation of narcissistic propensity ?

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)

January 2, 2007 12:25 PM | Posted by psychoa: | Reply

I've been enjoying reading your blog, especially your recent posts on Narcissism. I'd be interested to know more about how you understand the differences between this new narcissist and that described by others. You describe what I might call a malignant narcissist, one at the sociopathic end of the spectrum. Do you think less virulent, violence-prone forms of narcissism have ceased to exist or ought they go by some other name?

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)

January 4, 2007 4:14 PM | Posted by badabada: | Reply

You might be interested in the book "Life, the Movie, "by Neal Gabler. See http://www.amazon.com/Life-Movie-Neal-Gabler/dp/0679417524

It deals with many of these same issues from the point of view that we live our lives as though we were in a movie.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)

January 5, 2007 11:37 PM | Posted by JGreenberg: | Reply

I think malignant narcissism is something different-- what's being described here is one with psychopathy. But maybe that's his point, that our narcissism has transcended "personality disorder" and gone into dangerous psychopathy.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)

May 11, 2007 6:06 AM | Posted by Thank you: | Reply

Thank you for making these points. it was interesting to read about the family constelation aspect: oldest or only child vs. youngest child. your writing has been very helpful.

THANKS

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)

July 12, 2008 6:59 PM | Posted by Anonymous: | Reply

Whatever! Those white pumps are damn sexy!!!

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)

December 2, 2008 1:25 PM | Posted by La BellaDonna: | Reply

Heh. If the woman in the narcissist's life is Southern and/or adheres to certain fashion rules, good luck to him after Labor Day and before Memorial Day getting her to wear those things!

However, I have observed the "thing-by-proxy" myself, and had others report their observations to me, trying to work out why a man would go out with an average-looking blonde, rather than a very pretty brunette or redhead; the "thing-by-proxy" is that "blondes are beautiful/sexy" - without the blonde actually having to be so, herself. Darryl Hannah's success in Hollywood would be one example of that phenomenon at work.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)

December 29, 2008 11:14 AM | Posted by Matthew: | Reply

What would you say of the person who reads this article, and admits to relating to the content? Like, for example, I read any of that part about white heels, and then realize, “Wow, sounds kind of how I am when it comes to short skirts,” whatever. I guess my ultimate question is: Is the verdict the same, in instances where narcissistic traits are exhibited, but the “narcissist” is fully aware (and maybe embraces, maybe not) these traits? That is to say, can a narcissist of the kind you describe be aware of their narcissism?

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)

December 29, 2008 1:44 PM | Posted by Dr X: | Reply

Good post. How you think this is different from Kernberg (pathological early structures) or Kohut (normal arrested early structures)? I'm not seeing how this necessarily falls outside one of those two broad formulations.

The question of psychopathy is also being raised by the commenters. This is not a description of a psychopath. A psychopath doesn't experience humiliation (shame). Narcissists are highly vulnerable to shame. It is the trigger for their rage reactions. In contrast, psychopathic aggression is of the cool predatory variety.

For those interested in everyday interpersonal manifestations of narcissism, here is a link to an excellent article by Nancy McWilliams and Stanley Leppendorf.

http://www.ippnj.org/mcwilliams1.html

It's an easy read if you've got an analytic background, but the thoughtful lay reader will understand enough of it to find it very interesting and thought provoking, as well. If you have difficulty with the more theoretical introductory material, the everyday examples of narcissistic defenses will make things more clear as the article proceeds.

Alone's response: thanks, that is an excellent article. I would draw people's attention to the paragraph about "dropping" hints vs. bragging and manipulating the other to avoid taking responsibility for a difficult decision/action. Both of these maneuvers are designed to reinforce an existing identity-- that is entirely made up-- while simultaneously convincing other people that this identity is real. "No, my husband isn;t controlling, he let's me make most of the decisions, and he only rarely talks about himself.."

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)

June 11, 2009 12:47 AM | Posted by ME: | Reply

where can i but this shoes!!

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)

December 31, 2009 7:25 AM | Posted by staghounds: | Reply

So how do we tell if it's "I like the shoes on you" or "I'm a Narcissist"?

And it's slighted, not sleighted.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)

Post a Comment


Live Comment Preview

March 19, 2010 12:11 PM AM | Anonymous said: