April 25, 2007

Is Cho The Question?

Quick speculation. As 13 year old kids like this usually create an identity from multiple sources- so far we're pretty sure the main movie was Oldboy-- I wonder if he didn't also identify with the Question (the comic).  He signed his name as a question mark, he wore the same baseball cap, gloves with short sleeve shirt.  And, in case you weren't once a lost male adolescent, the Question is Vic Sage, ex-philosophy major turned TV reporter who is also a vigilante.  And the 30+ issues are all about his struggle with identity.

None of this is relevant to why he did it, of course.  It's fun to speculate, but of no predictive value.  These are costumes, roles.  They just help him "get into character," which in this case is a man alone fighting injustice, greed, and abuse, using whatever tools he has.  Of course, he was fighting college kids, and his tools were semi-automatics, but who am I to dispel a good illusion?

Finally, let me reiterate that the presence or absence of mental illness is irrelevant, at least as far as prediction goes. So let's say he was a violent schizophrenic.  Would you jail him before he commits a crime, just in case? Bush does that with Guantanamo, you know.  Do you send him to a psych hospital, like they do/did in the USSR?  That process will be magnificently abused by your government, I assure you.

More posts on Cho here, here, here, and here.







Comments

As a schizophrenic, I say y... (Below threshold)

April 28, 2007 3:21 AM | Posted by Mark(p.s.2): | Reply

As a schizophrenic, I say yes Cho should have been hospitalized (same as jail).
Someone should have forced him to be evaluated by a psychiatrist.
nevermind the security screw up.
I saw the video tape he made, and he made little sense. If someone does not share the same reality as 99.99% of the rest of the world , they probably need to be hospitalized (jailed)as they won't/don't/can't follow the rules everyone knows. If Cho could pass a psych examination it means he knew what he was doing.

Vote up Vote down Report this comment Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I believe this one applies ... (Below threshold)

May 28, 2007 5:04 PM | Posted by Casey Armijo: | Reply

I believe this one applies "Unless each man prodiuses more than he receives, increases his output, there will be less for him than all the others", doesn't it?

Vote up Vote down Report this comment Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
060199923687b8c18bccfe5300f... (Below threshold)

June 28, 2007 9:33 AM | Posted by Ethan Poor: | Reply

060199923687b8c18bccfe5300f818dc

Alone's response: Who are you?

Vote up Vote down Report this comment Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I think this one doesn't ma... (Below threshold)

October 9, 2007 4:15 PM | Posted by Shyanne Horner: | Reply

I think this one doesn't make any sense: breungles, mentioned somewhere

Vote up Vote down Report this comment Score: 0 (0 votes cast)